Phone
+263-29-2888371/8
Email Address
admin@coghlanandwelsh.com
Working Hours
Mon - Fri : 09:00-17:00

Jurisdiction of Criminal Courts in Customs Matters

ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY v MPOFU (HB 112-16, HC 956-16)

Case Summary

CourtHigh Court of Zimbabwe, Bulawayo
JudgeMathonsi J
PartiesApplicant: Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA), First Respondent: Sikhanyisiwe Mpofu, Second Respondent: Christian Ndlovu, Third Respondent: T. Tashaya N.O
TypeUrgent Chamber Application
Core IssueWhether a criminal court has jurisdiction to order the return of goods seized under Section 193 of the Customs and Excise Act when no criminal proceedings were initiated
OutcomeThe provisional order was granted in favor of ZIMRA, effectively staying the magistrate's order for the release of the seized fuel.
  • On March 29, 2016, ZIMRA seized 20,408 litres of petrol from first respondent and 7,450 litres from second respondent
  • Seizure was conducted under notices 014683L and 014684L on suspicion of smuggling
  • Public prosecutor declined to prosecute the criminal charges
  • First respondent wrote to Tredgold Court requesting release of fuel
  • Magistrate ordered release of 37,000 litres within 48 hours without hearing ZIMRA

Legal Principles & Considerations

Section 193 of the Customs and Excise Act prohibits criminal courts from ordering return of seized articles

Goods can only be returned by:

  • Commissioner General acting under the Act
  • Order of appropriate court in separate civil proceedings

Audi alteram partem rule (right to be heard) was violated

Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act Sections 59 and 61(1) were inapplicable

Court's Analysis & Reasoning

  • Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to make the order
  • No proper criminal proceedings were before the court
  • Order was made without hearing ZIMRA (breach of natural justice)
  • Respondents failed to institute proper civil proceedings
  • Magistrate’s actions were contrary to law and therefore void

Final Orders & Implications

The court granted the provisional order staying the magistrate’s decision, establishing that:

  • Criminal courts cannot order return of goods seized under Customs Act
  • Proper procedure requires separate civil proceedings
  • Orders made without jurisdiction are void
  • Natural justice principles must be observed

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you as soon as possible. Or if you’re in a hurry, call us now.

Call:  +263-29-2888371/8

admin@coghlanandwelsh.com Mon – Fri 09:00-17:00