Phone
+263-29-2888371/8
Email Address
admin@coghlanandwelsh.com
Working Hours
Mon - Fri : 09:00-17:00

Post-Separation Asset Division

Simba v Simba (HH 410-20)

Case Summary

CourtHigh Court of Zimbabwe
JudgeChitakunye J
PartiesTimothy Temba Simba (Plaintiff) vs Fungai Cathrine Simba (Defendant)
TypeDivorce Action
Core IssueDistribution of matrimonial property, particularly the matrimonial home
OutcomeCourt awarded the matrimonial home entirely to the defendant, including plaintiff's 50% share
  • Marriage solemnized on October 1, 1983, under Marriage Act [Chapter 5:11]
  • Marriage duration: 37 years (17 years cohabiting, 20 years separated)
  • Two children born of the marriage (one deceased)
  • Both parties were employed throughout marriage (plaintiff as executive, defendant as secretary)
  • Key Properties:
    •   Matrimonial home: Stand 271 Mandara Township (jointly owned)
    •   Second property: Stand 854 Mandara (sold by plaintiff after separation)
  • Plaintiff left matrimonial home in 1999/2000
  • Previous divorce proceedings initiated in 2001 and 2013 but not concluded

Legal Principles & Considerations

The court based its decision on Section 7 of the Matrimonial Causes Act [Chapter 5:13], considering:

  • Income-earning capacity of each spouse
  • Financial needs and obligations
  • Standard of living
  • Age and health conditions
  • Direct and indirect contributions
  • Duration of marriage
  • Potential benefits lost due to divorce

Key Legal Authorities:

  • Shenje v Shenje 2001(1) ZLR 160
  • Takafuma v Takafuma 1994 (2) ZLR 103(S)
  • Denhere v Denhere SC51/17

Court's Analysis & Reasoning

The court's decision was influenced by several key factors:

  • Defendant’s continued maintenance of the property and mortgage payments after separation
  • Plaintiff’s lack of full disclosure regarding assets acquired after separation
  • Defendant’s imminent retirement and health issues
  • Plaintiff’s superior financial position and earning capacity
  • Defendant’s 20-year sole responsibility for the property and children
  • Plaintiff’s unilateral sale of Stand 854 Mandara without consulting defendant
  • The need to ensure the defendant maintains a reasonable standard of living post-divorce

Final Orders & Implications

The court ordered:

  1. Decree of divorce granted
  2. Matrimonial home (58 Shaneragh Road, Mandara) awarded to defendant as sole and exclusive property
  3. Plaintiff to sign transfer documents within 30 days
  4. Sheriff authorized to sign if plaintiff fails to comply
  5. Defendant to bear transfer costs
  6. Each party to keep movable property in their possession
  7. Each party to bear own legal costs

Implementation Requirements:

  • Transfer documents to be signed within 30 days of request
  • Defendant responsible for transfer costs
  • Sheriff empowered to act if plaintiff fails to cooperate

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you as soon as possible. Or if you’re in a hurry, call us now.

Call:  +263-29-2888371/8

admin@coghlanandwelsh.com Mon – Fri 09:00-17:00